This is an extract from a small book of mine titled: “A brief and realistic approach to
the wanderings of Odysseus”, which was published in 2023 in Greek: https://www.politeianet.gr/books/9786185693046-metaxas-georgios-risos-mia-suntomi-kai-realistiki-proseggisi-stis-periplaniseis-tou-odussea-337605
A fundamental knowledge of Odyssey is necessary.
(Book numbers are always referring to Odyssey rhapsodies, except when
Iliad is specifically mentioned).
Homeric texts taken from:
http://johnstoniatexts.x10host.com/homer/odyssey5html.html
Odysseus in the land of Phaeacians
According to
the common knowledge, when we talk about the land of Phaeacians, everyone has
in mind the island of Corfu.
But Homer never
mentions Corfu (a name that didn’ t exist at his time), nor uses any of the older
names of this island (e.g. Drepane), actually he never says anything other than
“land of Phaeacians”. In addition, there is a strong argument against this assumption
(i.e that Corfu is the “island” of Phaeacians), and this is the relatively
small distance of Corfu from Ithaca, the home of Odysseus (probably not
contemporary Ithaca but rather the nearby island of Lefkas, but this is another
story). Odysseus, as can be deducted from Odyssey (if we consider the poem as a
reliable source for geography, distances, time intervals and human relations),
didn’t know about Phaeacians who were living “far away from Ithaca”, as he personally
states (book 9, 18) and more precisely “at the end of the Earth” according to
Nafsika (book 6, 204).
But a man as much
traveled around as Odysseus, would not consider Corfu as a “far away” land and for
sure he could not ignore Phaeacians living so close to his domain which included
most of the islands around Ithaca (book 1, 245-246), (Iliad book 2, 631-637).
On the other hand, neither Phaeacians themselves knew him personally and they
had only heard about his feats and bravery in the Trojan war.
For comparison, when the young and inexperienced son of Odysseus
Telemachus borrows a small ship with 20 oarsmen (book 1, 280) to sail to Pylos
seeking news about his father’s fate, at a distance about the same as from
today’s Ithaca to Corfu (more, if we consider as Odysseus’ Ithaca, Lefkas), he
does the trip with ease despite traveling mainly by night in both ways and in
less than 24 hours for each leg.
Also, in book 1, 183-184, Mentis a friend of
Odysseus (actually Athena in disguise) tells Telemachus that he is sailing to Temesa
to trade iron for copper. Whether it was Temesa in Calabria Italy or in Cyprus
(this is no clear), that was anyway a long and perilous voyage, but no comment was made from either side, indicating an unusual feat.
The assumption that Phaeacians were living in Corfu came from the fact, that Homer strongly implies that the trip of Odysseus aboard the Phaeacian ship to his homeland took just one night (book 13, 29-30 and 93-95), something quite feasible from Corfu. So, much later (3rd ce. BCE) Apollonius of Rhodes in his poem “Argonautica” which is obviously fictional and based on legends but tries to imitate Odyssey, names the present day Corfu (then Drepane) as the island of Phaeacians (Argonautica book 4, 982-991), although Homer always talks about the “land” of Phaeacians and never about an island!
The assumption that Phaeacians were living in Corfu came from the fact, that Homer strongly implies that the trip of Odysseus aboard the Phaeacian ship to his homeland took just one night (book 13, 29-30 and 93-95), something quite feasible from Corfu. So, much later (3rd ce. BCE) Apollonius of Rhodes in his poem “Argonautica” which is obviously fictional and based on legends but tries to imitate Odyssey, names the present day Corfu (then Drepane) as the island of Phaeacians (Argonautica book 4, 982-991), although Homer always talks about the “land” of Phaeacians and never about an island!
As about
Phaeacians themselves, it seems that there was something strange and mysterious about their
ships, because from the description of their king Alcinous they seem to sail without a pilot or a helmsman and their ships could find their way all by themselves
through mist and clouds, without any risk:
Tell me your country and
your
people,
your city, too, so ships can take you there,
using what they know to chart their passage.
Phaeacians have no pilots, no steering oar,
like other boats, for their ships on their own
can read men’s hearts and thoughts—they know
all men’s cities, their rich estates, as well,
and quickly skim across wide tracts of sea,
concealed in mist and clouds, without a fear
of shipwrecks or disaster.
your city, too, so ships can take you there,
using what they know to chart their passage.
Phaeacians have no pilots, no steering oar,
like other boats, for their ships on their own
can read men’s hearts and thoughts—they know
all men’s cities, their rich estates, as well,
and quickly skim across wide tracts of sea,
concealed in mist and clouds, without a fear
of shipwrecks or disaster.
Book 8, 556-562
This
description has given rise to various speculations, some so extreme as to
imply that Phaeacians possessed very
advanced technology, similar to or even exceeding that of the present time! But
in no less than in three occasions (for example book 7, 325-328) where the
preparations for the trip of Odysseus to his homeland are described, the crew
of the 52 oarsmen, the sails and the oars are all mentioned in a very
conventional way.
Probably, the
words of Alcinous, who as king was seeking to impress Odysseus (who’s true
identity was not revealed yet, but he could guess Odysseus high status), could imply the knowledge of the compass, a secret that was lost later on, along with
Phaeacians themselves. Actually the construction of a compass is very easy, by using
just a bucket of water, a free floating piece of wood and an elongated piece
of magnetic ore such as magnetite (picture 1).
Picture 1.
Medieval
compass from the book of the 17th century:
«Magnes
sive
de
arte
Magnetica»,
of German
Jesuit priest and scientist Athanasius Kircher. All necessary material were available at the time of Odysseus, as well. (Source: quora.com)
Such a piece of magnetic ore (hematite)
about 4 cm (1.6 in) long, was found in 1967 among other objects of the pre-Columbian
culture of Olmecs in central Mexico, and was dated between 1400 and 1000 BCE. American astronomer I. B. Carlson in
1975 theorised that the artefact was part of a compass made by Olmecs 1000
years earlier than the Chinese, i.e. at the era of the Odyssey (circa 1200 BCE).
So if there is evidence of the use of a magnetic ore as a compass in one part of
the world, it is plausible that this same could have happened in its
opposite side as well.
According to
an article of the Greek archaeologist Teresa Mitsopoulou in 1988 titled “The little fish on the bow”, this really could have happened, as implied by the
presence of a fish on the bow of ships depicted on the bottom of Cycladic
frying pans (2800 – 2300 BCE). Of course there are alternative hypotheses, that
it is about a wind direction indicator or even just an emblem.
Picture 2. Author’s
impression of how the rudders of a Phaeacian ship may look like, concealing
their existence and on the same time being much more efficient that the typical
external oar-like rudder(s) of that era. The rudder is lowered into a box like
“well” that prevents the sea entering the ship and its shaft is secured by a
removable plank. By taking the plank out, the rudder can be withdrawn through
the box into the ship, to enable the crew to drag the ship on the beach and/or
to conceal the principle. A similar system is used today for the removable
keels of the small Optimist sailing boats, but without the function of a
rudder.
With a compass, a ship obtains all the qualities
Alcinous was boasting about, i.e. the capability for an apparently “blind” navigation.
As about the absence of a rudder, it could well have been just not visible,
quite like a contemporary one (picture 2), while in the ships of the time of
Odyssey it looked more like a big oar (later two oars). It is also curious and straightforward
suspicious, that the trip started at sunset, something extremely dangerous for
that era, while Odysseus was kept apparently drugged throughout it.
Once they leaned back and stirred the water with their oars,
a calming sleep fell on his eyelids, undisturbed
and very sweet, something very similar to death.
a calming sleep fell on his eyelids, undisturbed
and very sweet, something very similar to death.
Book 13, 78-80
A “sleep” so deep, that the Phaeacian sailors had to carry him out of the
boat and laid him by an olive tree, still “sleeping”! And despite the fact that the ship had landed on the shore
with such momentum, that half of it came out of the water! (book 13, 114-115).
Just for comparison, about 10 years earlier in the beginning of his wanderings, when Odysseus sailed from
the island of Aeolus to Ithaka with his crew, he was so eager to see his homeland
that he stayed sleepless for nine days and nights in a row! (book 10, 28-31).
Interestingly,
Alcinous himself had foretold Odysseus that he will make the trip while
sleeping (book 7, 318), even if he had to be taken further than Euboea, that
lays, as they say, at the end of the world (book 7, 322).
Apparently,
Phaeacians wanted to protect their valuable secret (the compass) that made them
rulers at sea, but they were also “advertising” their navigation skills by
returning the shipwrecked sailors to their homes extremely fast, as they were
making them believe, while in reality they were just keeping them drugged.
As an interesting note, in the 1977 movie “The Odyssey” starring Armant Assante, that quite successfully tries to
present realistically that era (save for gods and
monsters), the deep sleep of Odysseus is justified as a result of drugging him
but for different reasons (to help him get some rest).
So where was the land of Phaeacians?
As most probable
location seems today’s Trapani, a main harbor in west Sicily, on which from
Google Earth two harbors are outlined (only the northern one in use today) as
Homer describes (book 6, 262-263). There, Phaeacians should have settled after
been ousted from the area of a volcano, probably Etna in east Sicily (book 6,
4-5), by their villain neighbors, Cyclops. Their new land was named
Scheria, and interestingly enough, in antiquity there was a certain town named Schera
in west Sicily. (picture 5).
Cyclops usually
were related to metallurgy and volcanoes, especially Etna, where they
supposedly had constructed Zeus thunderbolts. It is more than obvious that the
word “Trapani” originates from the word “Drepani” (the Greek word for sickle),
a name that Apollonius of Rhodes relates to the land of Phaeacians because of
their knowledge of growing cereals (Argonautica book 4, 988-991). But Apollonius
thought the place was Corfu because it was also named Drepane probably thanks
to the shape of its southern part in the form of a sickle. Sicily, by the way, was
the main cereal provider for the Mediterranean region in the antiquity.
About 15 km (9.5 miles) northeast of Trapani there is Rio Forgia, an area where a
small river (mostly dry today) flows to the sea, and this is the only sandy
area in an otherwise rocky coast. It was probably there where Nafsika, daughter
of king Alcinous, went to wash cloths with some other maidens “far from the city”
(book 6, 40) and there she was met with the shipwrecked (rather raftwrecked)
Odysseus.
Also, the name of Phaeacians (in Greek ”phaeos” means “ash color”) is
probably related to the ash of a volcano (Etna?) that periodically may have
covered their original land. Sometimes in the volcanic rock basalt, magnetite
can be found as well, an ore essential to make a compass.
Of course, the trip from Trapani to Ithaca (be that Lefkas or today’s
Ithaca) should have lasted about 3.5 days at a mean speed of 5.5 knots with a
well trained crew, rowing in shifts. This is of course incompatible with the
one night trip Homer implies, but as the only witness was profoundly asleep
(or rather drugged for 3.5 days) it cannot be taken at face value.
Another indication that
Sicily was in fact the land of Phaeacians is that it is big enough not to be
called an island by Homer, and the same happens even with the smaller Crete, which Homer calls
also a land, not an island.
|
|
Picture 3. Trapani in west Sicily, with the active harbor at the upper part of the picture. The second port of
Phaeacians should be the shallow bay (now rather a marsh) to the south. The
“petrified ship” corresponds to the elongated rock near the entrance of the
harbor, as indicated by the arrow. (Source: Google Earth).
Is it also a coincidence that near the entrance of
the harbor of Trapani there is a long rock evoking the “petrified ship” of
Phaeacians? This rock could have given Homer the inspiration to “create” a prophecy, according to which
Poseidon would petrify one of their ships as punishment for helping the sailors that
the god himself had decided to make suffer (book 13, 155-166 and 163-164).
Finally, approaching
Trapani from northwest, as Odysseus should have done with his raft, he was looking
at the low and rather flat mountain Erice at the northeast of Trapani that
really looks like a shield, as Homer characteristically describes (book 5,
279-281), (picture 4).
Picture 4. “some shadowy hills
appeared, where the land of the Phaeacians, like a shield riding on the
misty sea, lay very close to him” book 5, 279-281 Trapani from west. (Source: italiapozaszlakiem.com)
The Greeks at
the time of Odysseus certainly knew about Sicily, as his father Laertes had a
Sicilian housekeeper (book 12, 209-210). But the Greeks were mostly in contact
with Sicilians living on the east coast (picture 5), while on the west coast
were living Elymians who had probably an Aegean origin. Maybe the later were refugees from Thera (Santorini) and their “problems” with the Cyclops were in fact an allegory for the imminent eruption of the
volcano of Thera (circa 1600 BCE), so eventually they may were living in Thera
and not near Etna.
The lack of human
remains (unlike Pompei) in the area of Akrotiri Thera, where a town buried under the ash was unearthed practically intact in 1967, suggests that there was
enough warning before the main eruption, so most of the people managed to flee
by the sea and probably to the west, in the opposite direction of the proven path
of the ash. If Phaeacians were indeed Thera’s refugees, that could explain
their urge to move as far away as possible from another active volcano, that of
Etna.
Today, near the town of Erice (ancient Eryx) at an elevation of 750 m (2500 ft),
just a few kilometers northeast of Trapani, there are cyclopean walls that are
considered the works of either Elymians, Phoenicians or even Trojans
(Wikipedia).
Maybe the
Phaeacians after the passage of Odysseus were forced to move at higher ground
for safety, as their sea activities and wealth may have drawn unwanted attention, and
perhaps this was the meaning of the second part of the prophesy mentioned before:
He claimed that one day, as a splendid ship
of the Phaeacians was returning home,
after a convoy on the misty seas,
Poseidon would strike her and then throw up
a huge mountain range around our city.
of the Phaeacians was returning home,
after a convoy on the misty seas,
Poseidon would strike her and then throw up
a huge mountain range around our city.
Book 13,
175-177
It is also
evident that Phaeacians didn’t like to socialize with foreigners, as Nafsika had
stated:
...and we live far off in the surging sea,
the most remote of people. Other men
never interact with us.
the most remote of people. Other men
never interact with us.
Book 6, 204-205
and goddess Athena
(disguised as a young girl) also confirms later on:
The people here are not fond of strangers—
they don’t extend a friendly welcome
to those from other lands
they don’t extend a friendly welcome
to those from other lands
Book 7, 32-33
Phaeacians knew
that their peaceful nature wouldn’t allow them to successfully resist invaders.
So perhaps the “Phaeacians” was not the real name of these people but an alias,
if we accept the principle that the main events in Odyssey are true and the
initial source of information was Odysseus himself, who was probably willing to
return the favor and conceal Phaeacians' identity. For the same reason, the true
duration of the final leg of the trip of Odysseus may have been purposefully shortened.
All the same,
the names of the Phaeacian people (book 8, 110-119) sound like “made up” as
they are all related to sea activities, and even (the names) show a certain lack of
imagination.
About Elymians, there is
the record of Thucydides (book VI, 2) that they have been descendants of Trojans, an opinion shared with Virgil (Aeneid, book V) who was eager to prove the Trojan (i.e. heroic) origin of the Roman people. Homer himself had
“prophesied” that Aeneas would become the new leader of Trojans and that eventually
happened not in Ilion (Troy) that was destroyed, but in western Italy. There
arrived as refugees many Trojans sailing around Sicily to avoid the Straits of
Messina with their terrifying reputation and some of them settled in the area
of Trapani, as Virgil says. In that case, the Trojans arrived in Trapani well
before Odysseus who, because of his wanderings (he had spent also idle one year with Circe and seven and half more years with Calypso) arrived to Phaeacians
ten years after the fall of Troy.
So, even if Alcinous didn’t mention anything about Trojan refugees to Odysseus
(at least Homer doesn’t say so), the blind poet and singer in the Phaeacian court Demodocus sang about the fall of Troy
in such a way, that Odysseus commended:
...as if you yourself were there
or heard the story from a man who was.
or heard the story from a man who was.
Book 8, 490
And the man who “was there” was probably a Trojan. That’s why the
descriptions Demodocus makes, especially the thoughts of Trojans about the
Trojan Horse, are from their point of view! (book 8, 504-509). He even knew
incorrectly the protagonists of the quarrel between the Greek leaders, naming
Odysseus and Achilles, when of course they were Agamemnon and Achilles and the
cause was different (book 8, 74-76), as quite logically the Trojans didn’t know
the details of the famous quarrel that was the beginning of their end (and the
main subject of Iliad).
So probably Trojan refugees settled at Erice or at Egesta (later Segesta), both places been near Trapani (picture 5) and eventually merged, with the Phaeacians becoming Elymians, or just merged with the Elymians if the Phaeacians never really
existed.
It is also a curious coincidence that the people of Thera and the Phaeacians were always involved in peaceful activities (a rarity for that era) and both were very capable seamen, a contrast to the claim of the Phaeacians been relatives to the savage, brutal and hillbilly Cyclops (book 7, 205-206, book 9, 122-123). Of course, there is no mystery if we consider that the “Cyclops” were the volcanoes of Thera, Etna or any of the volcanic Aeolian islands at northeast of Sicily.
It is also a curious coincidence that the people of Thera and the Phaeacians were always involved in peaceful activities (a rarity for that era) and both were very capable seamen, a contrast to the claim of the Phaeacians been relatives to the savage, brutal and hillbilly Cyclops (book 7, 205-206, book 9, 122-123). Of course, there is no mystery if we consider that the “Cyclops” were the volcanoes of Thera, Etna or any of the volcanic Aeolian islands at northeast of Sicily.
Picture 5. The three main group of people in early antiquity in Sicily . In book
24 Odysseus says initially to his father a fake story, that he had arrived in
Ithaca from Sicania (book 24, 302-303). Sicanians were living in the centre of
Sicily, while Sicilians were living in the east and Elymians to the west. The
arrow indicates the town Schera (Scheria was the name of the land of Phaeacians),
later destroyed by Carthagenians, very close to the present town of Corleone
(not shown), better known from the movies “Godfather”. Drepano is the modern
day Trapani. (Source: sicilia arcaica.jpg)
The Greek origin of Phaeacians can also be deduced from the long talks and detailed
narrations between Odysseus and
Phaeacians, even when ordinary people were
involved. That makes a clear contrast with previous cases when Odysseus and his
men encountered strange people in their long wanderings, where their
interaction was elementary.
As about Homer, he was rather a close
relative to Odysseus and probably his grandson, as the oracle of
Delphi according tο a legend pronounced, answering an enquiry of Roman emperor Hadrian. If this is the case, it
is no wonder that Homer knew all the details of Odysseus’ adventures firsthand,
at least as Odysseus wanted to be remembered by the next generations. And as about how
Homer would like others to think about himself, may be reflected in the words of Odysseus to the blind poet Demodocus when the later sang about the sack of Troy, as
mentioned above:
...as if you yourself were there
or heard the story from a man who was.
or heard the story from a man who was.
Book 8, 490
Finally,
a last word about the name of Homer, that has fueled so many theories and
controversies. “Homer” (Όμηρος)
in Greek means “guarantor” (dictionary of ancient Greek Liddell and
Scott). So
this is perhaps the name that he has chosen for himself to be known, as he
would guarantee that the feats of Odysseus (and the sack of Troy) would live for eternity. And he concealed
his relation to Odysseus to add credibility to his narration.
G. Metaxas
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου